Communion Under Both Species - What's the Big Deal?
Posted by: tony on 10/15/2006 05:54 PM
Updated by: tony on 10/18/2006 08:24 PM
|
Expires: 11/18/2006 12:00 AM
|
The Curt Jester, Jeff Miller, pointed me to a blog I have never read, galea salutis. The author (I couldn't find a name or a handle, so I'll have to refer to him or her as galea) discusses something that is near and dear to me. Communion under both species.
For devout Catholics, we may say that this idea is some what of a natural reaction. We profess belief in that the bread and wine cease to exist after the consecration and became the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Jesus Christ and then see Him casually trucked, in chalices and ciboria, quickly and uncovered, across the church. This treatment is not consistent with the great reverence a belief in the Real Presence would afford. I do not imply that the agents of this action do not believe, but I only point out that the image they create contradicts the idea they profess. The multiplication of chalices and extraordinary ministers is particularly scandalous because in its practice the reality of the Real Presence is ordered beneath the convenience of the assembly. The message that this is "Truly the Son of God" is seconded-placed by the message "We need to get these people through as fast as we can."
I would never presume to know someone's belief in the Real Presence, but I have seen the handling of the Body and Blood of Jesus in a manner that would contradict any belief that actually existed. An example is the case of an EME, when receiving the Blood of Christ from the chalice, happened to dribble some on his shirt. He immediately brushed the drops off of his shirt to the floor, to the horror of the celebrating priest.
galea continues in another post, which offers clarification:
The presumption here is an important distinction. The 'communion' we share is with Christ and, through Him, the Church. However, it is only through Him that true communion is reached. One of symbols of the Communion procession is the unity of the people gathered together, however, the purpose and reality of the procession is union with Christ. We must never over-emphasize a symbol to the detriment of the reality (ed.- the emphesis is mine). In the Sacraments, Christ choose material symbols to convey supernatural reality. These symbols point to the true reality; they are not ends in themselves. I get the impression from many lay people that they feel 'entitled' to received Communion under both species and would be very upset (if not sinfully angry) if they did not get the 'full' deal. These reflects a lack of catechesis and an over-emphasis on the symbol, an over-emphasis which has crippled their understanding of the reality.
This author has hit on something that I believe I've been aware of for a long time, but have never been able to properly articulate. Since Vatican II, in many churches, the focus seems to have shifted from communion with Christ, to communion with each other. This is exemplified in songs such as "Sing a New Church", and cute little local "ceremonies" such as a "head EME" processing to the side eucharistic chapel to retrieve pre-consecrated hosts (which you're not supposed to have an over abundance of; people should be receiving "fresh" Jesus, consecrated at that Mass).
I am old enough to remember the pre-Vatican II Mass, and the priest was the only one who licitly received the Blood of Christ. I believe the widespread distribution of the Precious Blood had the unfortunate side effect of yet blurring the divide between the priest acting in persona Christi, and the congregation.
I'm sure the retort, should the Blood be eliminated would be: "What?!?!?! I'm not good enough to drink the wine?!?!?!" (And I used the term "wine", because that is the term most likely to be used by badly catechized Catholics).
I have had cases of people calling our pastor "the communion Nazi" because he eliminated the widely used practice of self-intinction of the host (where a communicant would walk up to the chalice of the Precious Blood with the Body of Christ in his or her hand and "dunk" it in the cup like a donut in a cup of coffee), which is illicit.
So check out that blog, and read the interesting articles about the sacrifice of the mass.
The Message of the Madness
Communion under both species - The Law
Communion under both kinds - How did we get where we are? and What’s the big deal?
Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion - The Law
|