Cluelessness Down Under
Posted by: tony on 11/22/2007 04:19 PM
Updated by: tony on 11/22/2007 04:38 PM
|
Expires: 12/23/2007 12:00 AM
|
 (Via Dawn Eden)
Andrea Burns from Austraila's Herald Sun just doesn't get it.
IT'S been said that there are two types of women - the ones men want to marry and the ones they want to have sex with.
And it is common knowledge among women that men are reluctant to combine the two -- right?
Actually you have it wrong. Most men, if you ask them out of earshot of other men will tell you that they really have no interest in marrying a woman who will give herself to anybody. Oh, heck, many of them will "play" with her if she allows it. It is the nature of our particular sex, a nature that is played on 24/7 by modern entertainment and advertising.
Men very much love to have sex with the woman they marry, who bear their children and love them even with their many faults.
Modern women's sexual liberation is a farce.
Truer words were never spake. But I wouldn't imagine in the context that Ms. Burns utters them.
Modern women's "sexual liberation" is a farce. It is not liberating. All you have to do is watch "Sex and the City". The "professional women" portrayed on that show go from man to man and are more miserable after each "relationship", shallow as it is, ends.
This is not "liberation", it's "enslavement". It is enslavement to an "ideal" which is light years away from ideal. It is subscribing to the bill of good sold by the latest radical feminist with a PC and a publisher.
Sex is a simple act, but as long as women think monogamous sex equals love and multiple partners equals deviance, we will never find fulfilment.
Did she just say "woman are simple"? I had always thought men were simple. If women feed us, make love to us occasionally and show us a modicum of respect, we're content. I had always thought that women were complicated. I guess I'm just going to have to completely re-think all that I thought I knew about the fairer sex.
I guess the way to fulfill a woman is to shag as many of them as you can so they have a nice selection of partners. I can hear the collective "Ya-HOO!!!" from the adolescent contingent (of any chronological age) of the male sex. It's time to fulfill the women. Gentlemen, start your engines.
Why do we feel dirty if we shag numerous sexual partners -- or worse -- show disgust for fellow femmes if they "sleep around"?
Because the law of God is written on the human heart, whether you want to admit it or not. When you do things contrary to this law, you feel bad about it. This is called "conscience" for those who have never experienced its twinges. To be joyful (as opposed to "happy"), what you ought to be doing is cultivating that small voice, not muffling it.
We don't need to convince the blokes of this. I am guessing they will lose that mother complex quick smart if women had sex like men.
Nope. We "blokes" are discriminating. We understand that there are women who will give their heart and share their bodies with one and only one man. And as in the case of Dawn, this attitude adjustment can happen after some time of "indiscretion".
But many of us "blokes" don't believe that sex is "simple". We don't find fulfillment, like you appear to, in "rubbing pee-pees". Oh some will take the occasional "no strings" sex if you offer it. But in their heart of hearts, they'll feel guilty about it. The difference is they'll get over it quickly. My guess is you won't.
What they will not do is marry a woman who gives the impression to him that he is one of her "conquests". We don't like being sex objects either.
So Andrea (can I call you "Andrea"?), the problem is not with your attitude. It's with the "blokes". You can change your behavior all you like, but you're not going to change the "blokes". As long as there are women in the world who respect themselves, and respect the men who court them, those are the women that will attract the "blokes" to marry them like bees to honey. The only way you are going to get the "blokes" to lower their standards, is to reduce the number of women like Wendy, Dawn, Laura and countless others who are leading the charge for chastity, modesty and feminity.
|
