Catholic Pillow Fight
ZZzzzzzzz....
"When someone asks you 'think about what Jesus would do', remember that a valid option is to freak out and turn over tables" -- Unknown
Menu
Home
E-Mail Me
Chat
Forum
Daily Readings
Search

Log In
Username

Password

Remember Me




Search Blog Entries





Blog Entries
Truly Amazing Christmas News | Home |All I Need to Know About Economics...
Sulking Republicans, reform2 crew and theocons, oh my!
Posted by: tony on 01/06/2009 06:12 PM
Updated by: tony on 01/06/2009 06:12 PM
Expires: 02/06/2009 12:00 AM

Todd from Catholic Sensibility is usually quite sensible. This time, I think he wanders a bit off the mark:
Insight Scoop gives a preview of an interesting, but misguided editorial in this month's Homiletic and Pastoral Review. Why are Catholics hemorrhaging in such numbers over the past two generations or so. Father Joseph Sirba echoes a theme I found on Inside Catholic today. Blame the liberals for a declining Church and send them off to follow the homosexuals in the dark of night to wail and gnash their teeth.

Heh. Nice start. I certainly don't either they, or the homosexuals wandering into the dark of night, I want them to repent, confess and come back to the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church.
Sorry, but I’m not buying it. The theocons, reform2 crew, and the other sulking Republicans still have me in the Church and there’s nothing they can do about it. Can't get me fired. Can’t shut down my blog. I’m pretty sure other progressives aren't shaking in their boots either.

Nor would I want to. If the heterodox are not out in the open espousing their views, we won't have the opportunity to turn their hearts and minds back toward God.
That immediate pre-conciliar generation must have been really strong on Church issues to bail so quickly after Humanae Vitae, a reformed liturgy, television, the suburbs, the sexual revolution, and all. Maybe the seeming decline in Catholicism has something more behind it than the usual liberal/conservative politics. But if some of them are still steamed over the Republicans getting it handed to them this past year, I can empathize.

Yup, Todd takes the high road on this one. The reason Republicans got it "handed to them" this year is that almost all of the major news outlets had a big, wet, sloppy love affair with Barack Obama. I'm sure the honeymoon will be over soon, and they will decide that there are not enough Republican scandals to sell papers or advertising and will turn on their Democrat masters. But I digress...

The pre-conciliar generation (of which I am near the last, having been born in 1959) lost their faith because they had the liturgical rug pulled out from underneath them with little if any catechesis accompanying it. The pre-conciliar generation who lost their faith and/or left probably fell into one of two groups.

The first group (of which I count myself) came to the conclusion that if the rules could be changed so quickly and radically, then the premise on which it is based must be crap.

The second group probably decide that instead if settling for "Protestant lite", they might as well go to a real Protestant church.
Now let's get serious with Father Sirba's proposals.
All remaining dissenters must be expunged from their positions within diocesan offices, major parishes and influential positions in the Church.
Fr Sirba preaches every leader in the Church needs to be presenting a clear message. I'm assuming that's one simple, single message. Problem is that most challenging obstacles need more than one perspective. I think we've seen the results of a purged episcopacy over the JPII years: bishops and their cronies appointed to the episcopacy sheltered sex offenders and then didn't even have the guts to admit they were wrong–they blamed select psychologists, stonewalled the victims and their families, and by the way … how many Catholic losses in Boston? Lots of Catholics are upset and concerned about the criminal and immoral behavior of some bishops, but I suspect Cardinal Law and others won't be part of Fr Sirba's purge.

"Sex offenders". Let's call it what it is. 87% of all of the child abuse claims were homosexual priests praying on post-pubescent teenage boys. This was directly caused by the relaxing of the sexual mores and the "free love" that Todd mentioned in a previous paragraph.

As far as the liberal and VOTF boogeyman, Cardinal Law, he's already been purged. When was the last time you heard any major speech or writing come out of him.

Also, it wasn't "select psychologists". It was the entire psychological community of the time that believed that this sort of behavior could be "cured". These priests got a clean bill of health from their psychologists, and were placed in the community on their recommendation.

I'm sure that there were a couple bad-apple bishops who knew that these predators might prey again, but my guess is that the majority of them were simply following the dictates of the "science" of the time. The injustice is that we are holding those bishops to a standard they weren't aware of at the time, and the "anti-clericalists" want to push back the statute of limitations to include more priests and bishops who knew even less.

I would like Todd to provide a list of the bishops that the Blessed John Paul II appointed and which ones were involved in the child abuse scandal. I don't expect it to be forthcoming, though.
Aggressive steps to retain Hispanic Catholics? No problem there.
The overt and covert feminization of the Church must end. Men and boys need strong male role models to look up to and to emulate. Masculine approaches to the faith must be developed and affirmed if we are to erase the significant gender gap that now exists and retain more of our male members.

Another aggrieved man whining about too many women. One of the reasons why women are more involved than men in every major religion and practically every minor one is that there are "psychological and emotional differences" between the sexes. I suppose that cassocks, surplices, frilly vestments, magnae cappae, and the like will inspire manliness in young boys.

I wonder if Todd has the same bias about men in kilts. I suggest he mention to the next kilted Scotsman he meets that he's some sort of girly-man.

Used to be a time the priest stood "alter Christus" (that is "other Christ" for the Latin impaired liberals). There is nobody manlier than Christ. When the priest stood in the sanctuary it used to be known that he was taking the part of Christ in the Liturgy. When he spoke the words: "This is my body", Christ Himself was offering the sacrifice of Calvary in real time, and we were joining with every church at every Mass in every age at the same exact moment in communion with the Angels and Saints.

Now the priest is, in many cases, simply a "sacrament vending machine". He has been relegated to second hand status. What young man would want to give up the possibility a wife and children to do that? I know I wouldn't. Well, unless a wife and children weren't important to you in the first place, but that's for another discussion...
I will say that boys and young men do indeed need better role models. So do girls and young women. The fragmentation of the extended family in our mobile society has done significant harm to every generation since suburbia, the car, and the mobile career have arrived on the scene.

So the way to solve that problem is to marginalize men in the Church. Maybe have priestesses?

The way to solve that problem is to have priests who are secure in their role as pastor or priest. The Church has stopped challenging us men. Jesus is treated like a lover in some cheap Harlequin romance. There needs to be a focus on our fallen nature, our sinfulness and our call to live a life of holiness. We need other men to support us.

Jesus' call was a radical one, and 11 of his 12 original followers died a violent death. That's an adventure story that many authentic men would love to be involved in.

If you want a masculine approach to Catholicism, join one of Richard Rohr's drumming groups or something. Liberals have had their manly groups for a long time. Maybe the theocons are just fraidy cats about joining them.

I don't know. I just don't think the Sisters of the Perpetual Indulgence would want me as a member.



Filed in :: Heterodoxy


What's Related
These might interest you as well
Blog


Our Sponsor